Self-Publishing Gives Authors Control over Design and Content, Part II
In part one of this article, we discussed two issues involved in the decision to self publish. Now we’ll delve into three more issues that writers have to think about when deciding whether to go the traditional publishing route or to self publish.
* Issue Three: Content
Book publishers have a lot of control over the editorial content in books. With self publishing, however, the writer has the final say over the printed content. While editing your own book or hiring an editor can take time and money, it can also give a writer the control over what stays and what goes in a book.
* Issue Four: Profit
Book publishing is a business like any other business…making money is the primary goal. With traditional book publishing, book publishers retain most of the profit with the writer getting either a set fee for writing the book or some residuals, usually just pennies on the dollar. However, with self publishing, all profits go straight into the writer’s pocket. There’s no middleman to deal with in self publishing. This means a potentially greater profit for self publishing writers.
* Issue Five: Marketing
In order to sell a book, the public has to know it exists. While traditional book publishers can do blitz marketing campaigns that result in big sales, they usually reserve these campaigns for established writers. Self publishing writers, on the other hand, have the option to conduct their own marketing which can mean greater exposure for a book.
Self publishing is not the answer for every writer but it’s a viable option for many. There are many issues a writer need to consider before deciding whether to query agents and editors in publishing houses or whether to go straight to self publishing. Either option has its own pros and cons. The job of the writer is to decide which option works best for his or her book.
Popularity: 10% [?]



